Re: Shut Up With The Open Source Politics, OK?
"John" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3F89A750.11299.DEB49F@localhost> |
On 11 Oct 2003 at 22:15, John Andersen wrote: > So since linux is no more popular there than anywhere > else, we can only assume the 1) you CAN work over > there without iso9000, or 2) no one takes it seriously > and everyone is lieing about what they do, and/or 3) the > iso evaluators are all on the take. 1) You can't, the 1st question asked is "are you ISO9000 accreditated?" 2) People do lie and cover-up most of the time, at least where I work. 3) Not sure but possible. I believe ISO9000 has actually been designed by a very clever person. It's obviously designed to reduce unemployment which I suspect was its intent all the time (it also explains why the government contracts were the first to request it). It keeps a lot of people filing useless bits of paper all day long. > > I can only go by the facts of sales figures for Windows > and other closed source OSs - including those with > known and unpatched bugs like Excel. > Excel can be downright dangerous, we've had several instances when it gave the wrong answer or an OLE link did not update when it should have. I avoid it as much as I can. And as much as I can, I use my own software. > I think you SHOULD read the article, because as long > as ISO certified people don't speak out against it this > travesty will continue. I've been pretty vocal against it where I work :^)