Re: Shut Up With The Open Source Politics, OK?

"John" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usability.annoyances
Message-ID <3F89A750.11299.DEB49F@localhost>
On 11 Oct 2003 at 22:15, John Andersen wrote:
> So since linux is no more popular there than anywhere
> else, we can only assume the 1) you CAN work over
> there without iso9000, or 2) no one takes it seriously
> and everyone is lieing about what they do, and/or 3) the
> iso evaluators are all on the take.

1) You can't, the 1st question asked is "are you ISO9000 
accreditated?"
2) People do lie and cover-up most of the time, at least where I 
work.
3) Not sure but possible.


I believe ISO9000 has actually been designed by a very clever 
person. It's obviously designed to reduce unemployment which I 
suspect was its intent all the time (it also explains why the 
government contracts were the first to request it). It keeps a 
lot of people filing useless bits of paper all day long.

> 
> I can only go by the facts of sales figures for Windows
> and other closed source OSs  - including those with
> known and unpatched bugs like Excel.  
> 

Excel can be downright dangerous, we've had several instances 
when it gave the wrong answer or an OLE link did not update when 
it should have. I avoid it as much as I can. And as much as I 
can, I use my own software.

> I think you SHOULD read the article, because as long
> as ISO certified people don't speak out against it this
> travesty will continue.

I've been pretty vocal against it where I work :^)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.