Re: Classic case of why Linux ultimately must fail

Now thats what I call annoying. First off is your subject, it is quite 
aggressive and sounds like an intended conspiracy.

R. Bruce wrote:

>Hi:
>
>  Well, it seems the Linux Annoyances forum  has become a single-thread
>topic -- Open Source Politics -- devoted to explaining to the unconverted
>why Open Source has copyrighted The Truth once and for all.
>
I havent read any threads on "The Truth©", and still there have been 8 
active threads this month *not* dealing with OS politics. Sure there are 
alot of pro-Linux rants and such, but it should be expected.
I didn't see many negative windows threads in the MCSE or MS Exchange  
mailing lists I was in. As a matter of fact most of them praised certian 
features in exchange or outlook, politely helping the next in line to 
figureout a "Solution©" to their problem.  I see alot of good 
"Solutions" to annoyances in this ML, but to post such drivle in an 
attempt to bolster your plans for Linux's demise is a bit egotistical. 
Opinions are like assholes, yours stinks. Not every OpenSource advocate 
wants to convert the world, I especially don't want the ungrateful 
lusers to enjoy the benifits of OS all the while conspireing  and 
promoting the defilement of its supporters and developers for speaking 
thier minds.

>
>  Yawn -- I'm bored now.  Please unsubscribe me.
>
>
>Bye bye, children,
>Ricardo
>
Buh Bye Troll.

>
>
>_______________________________________________
>annoyances mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://michelangelo.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/annoyances
>
>
>  
>