RE: graphical file managers
"Pablo Vieira" <listas-FYuJXz9k+h59uiUsa/[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:42:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004901c39261$85579b60$3600a8c0@Pablo> |
I'm sure it's your honest opinion, but calling Explorer "totally unusable" must be a joke. Linux definitely lacks a holistic definition of user interaction. The current mess is keeping too many people from even trying this OS. p > -----Mensaje original----- > De: annoyances-bounces-DzJonyRHso41Ayx8vbq1stBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org > [mailto:annoyances-bounces-DzJonyRHso41Ayx8vbq1stBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org] En nombre de > Daniel C. von Asmuth > Enviado el: martes, 14 de octubre de 2003 15:33 > Para: Seeking Linux annoyances for a book. > Asunto: Re: [Annoyances] graphical file managers > > > Thus quoth Dexter Filmore op Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:50:45PM +0200: > > What annoys me most in Linux desktop environments is the lack of a > > decent file manager such as Explorer. > > 'Windows Explorer' is totally unusable I.M.H.O. On Windows I > use Norton > Commander 5.0 (in a DOS box) or even Winfile (not present in W2K), on > Unix I use Midnight Commander (in an xterm). > > Kind regards, > > > Daniel von Asmuth > > > -- > If Gates had meant us to use Windows, > He would have given us three hands. > _______________________________________________ > annoyances mailing list > [email protected] > http://michelangelo.renaissoft.com/mailman/list> info/annoyances > > >