RE: graphical file managers

"Pablo Vieira" <listas-FYuJXz9k+h59uiUsa/[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:42:53 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usability.annoyances
Message-ID <004901c39261$85579b60$3600a8c0@Pablo>
I'm sure it's your honest opinion, but calling Explorer "totally
unusable" must be a joke.

Linux definitely lacks a holistic definition of user interaction. The
current mess is keeping too many people from even trying this OS.

p


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: annoyances-bounces-DzJonyRHso41Ayx8vbq1stBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org 
> [mailto:annoyances-bounces-DzJonyRHso41Ayx8vbq1stBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org] En nombre de 
> Daniel C. von Asmuth
> Enviado el: martes, 14 de octubre de 2003 15:33
> Para: Seeking Linux annoyances for a book.
> Asunto: Re: [Annoyances] graphical file managers
> 
> 
> Thus quoth Dexter Filmore op Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:50:45PM +0200:
> > What annoys me most in Linux desktop environments is the lack of a 
> > decent file manager such as Explorer.
> 
> 'Windows Explorer' is totally unusable I.M.H.O. On Windows I 
> use Norton 
> Commander 5.0 (in a DOS box) or even Winfile (not present in W2K), on 
> Unix I use Midnight Commander (in an xterm).
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> 
> Daniel von Asmuth
> 
> 
> -- 
> 	If Gates had meant us to use Windows,
> 	He would have given us three hands. 
> _______________________________________________
> annoyances mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://michelangelo.renaissoft.com/mailman/list> info/annoyances
> 
> 
>