Re: Lack of innovation
"Daniel C. von Asmuth" <asmuth-8LkvcxCLB6JmR6Xm/[email protected]> Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:07:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thus quoth Pablo Vieira on Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:16:51PM +0200: > > I long for simplicity, better user interface design, less features > better organised. I also long for risky moves like the Next computer, Try embedded Linux variants. They generally have fewer features. > concepts like the one in ClarisWorks, and so many innovations the Mac > brought to us (and that Microsoft finally copied...). Since programming How many innovations did Mac bring? 0 (zero), I believe. (or maybe the SCSI interface, but they didn't invent that) In several ways the Apple ][ was more advanced than the MacIntosh. (8 slots, color graphics, nice OS) > for Linux is not about making money, what is keeping Linux developers > from innovate? Why do so many take the easy road of cloning instead of > creating some totally new concepts? How about the Beowulf project? The competition does not have anything similar. Linux has also a range of minor features that are fairly inno- vative, like its modularised kernel and plug-and-play capabilities (load driver on the fly when a new piece of hardware is inserted), the user-mode Linux and kernel-mode Linux features, etc. > I follow very closely the Mozilla Firebird project which I find > innovative and well thought (with the right goals, at least). I was Innovative? Now while reducing the number of bugs in Netscape may be a good idea..... Kind regards, Daniel von Asmuth -- If Gates had meant us to use Windows, He would have given us three hands.