Re: licensing
"Nicolas Pettiaux" <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:46:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usage.government |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am sorry to step into and not having had the time to read the whole thread so far. As usual, I see a very lively discussion comparing BSD and coplyleft style licence. It's, for me a matter of circomstance, objectives and sometimes personnal choice. I choose GPL because I want that the other share alike (to use the wording of the creative commons) I wanted to make sure that the list knew the existence of a report that has been published last year by the French ADAE (French for Agency for the développement of the electronic administration) It's title is precisely : Guide de choix et d'usage des licences de logiciels libres pour les administrations or GUIDE TO CHOOSING AND USING FREE SOFTWARE LICENCES FOR GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES We (the Free Software community) have insisted that the document be also published in English, and it was. You can find it at http://www.adae.pm.gouv.fr/spip/article.php3?id_article=172 and specifically the report (both parts) at http://www.adae.pm.gouv.fr/upload/documents/Atica_free_software_guide.sxw http://www.adae.pm.gouv.fr/upload/documents/free_software_guide_detailed_analysis.pdf Part of the justification comes from the article from Philippe Aigrain who arguments in that direction http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/aigrain2.pdf The executive summary of the report is simple: the Adae recommends to use the GPL, but leave the final choice to the deparment of the administration. This has been appreciated by the Free Software community in France. Best regards, Nicolas Pettiaux -- Nicolas Pettiaux Vice-president AFUL http://www.aful.org/