Re: looks like it's happening everywhere but the US.

Jeff Kinz <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:26:58 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usage.government
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:08:42PM -0400, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 14:45, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> > Tom - Please trim your posts down to the relevant pieces.
> > 
> > Please post just one example of a LAW or even a regulation that states 
> > "Vendor X cannot bid for this work" Excepting cases where the vendor 
> > is excluded for reasons of conflict of interest, criminal history,
> > or has already been selected to audit or supervise the work, or has
> > already been eliminated from the selection process in a previous bidding
> > round.
> > 
> > 
> I didn't interpret Tom's posting as referring to legal exclusion.

Precisely, 

I was. I said We cannot use legislation to prohibit specific vendors
from bidding/competing for work with the government. 
(legal exclusion defined)

Tom said that we can and do and then started describing something else
entirely.  - bid requirements, procurement regulations and the like.
But of course even these cannot prohibit a specific vendor from
competing for a job.  They merely raise hurdles for ALL vendors
to jump over.  

Those that can't, won't get the work.

And Yes -I admit that those "hurdles" can be specifically crafted to
favor specific vendors.  This form of favoritism will always be with us.

-- 
Jeff Kinz, Open-PC, Emergent Research,  Hudson, MA.  [email protected]
copyright 2003.  Use is restricted. Any use is an 
acceptance of the offer at http://www.kinz.org/policy.html.
Don't forget to change your password often.