Re: looks like it's happening everywhere but the US.
Jeff Kinz <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:26:58 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usage.government |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:08:42PM -0400, Joseph Dal Molin wrote: > On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 14:45, Jeff Kinz wrote: > > Tom - Please trim your posts down to the relevant pieces. > > > > Please post just one example of a LAW or even a regulation that states > > "Vendor X cannot bid for this work" Excepting cases where the vendor > > is excluded for reasons of conflict of interest, criminal history, > > or has already been selected to audit or supervise the work, or has > > already been eliminated from the selection process in a previous bidding > > round. > > > > > I didn't interpret Tom's posting as referring to legal exclusion. Precisely, I was. I said We cannot use legislation to prohibit specific vendors from bidding/competing for work with the government. (legal exclusion defined) Tom said that we can and do and then started describing something else entirely. - bid requirements, procurement regulations and the like. But of course even these cannot prohibit a specific vendor from competing for a job. They merely raise hurdles for ALL vendors to jump over. Those that can't, won't get the work. And Yes -I admit that those "hurdles" can be specifically crafted to favor specific vendors. This form of favoritism will always be with us. -- Jeff Kinz, Open-PC, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA. [email protected] copyright 2003. Use is restricted. Any use is an acceptance of the offer at http://www.kinz.org/policy.html. Don't forget to change your password often.