Re: looks like it's happening everywhere but the US.
Russell McOrmond <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:55:17 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usage.government |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Jeff Kinz wrote: > You misunderstood. I'm saying that the US is moving to Open Source, but > that we can't enact laws that prohibit specific vendors from competing > to do the work for the government. > > In order to disagree with me you would have to be saying that Americans > can enact laws that prohibit a specific vendor from competing for work. What does specifying vendors have to do with Open Source or the various laws that are being proposed or enacted in other countries? I believe we all misunderstood what you were saying as it appeared as if you were suggested that the two had a link to each other. Free/Libre and Open Source Software is not a vendor, but a vendor-neutral methodology. Even if the government mandated FLOSS licenses for all software procured/used/distributed by government this would not prohibit any specific vendor from competing to do the work any more than governments requiring construction workers conform to safety standards does not prohibit any suppliers. Trade agreements not allowing vendors to be mandated in procurements should be helping us, but we have a long way to go to stop people from thinking that pro-FLOSS legislation is somehow discouraged by pro-competition aspects of trade agreements. Mandating preferential treatment for FLOSS is really just a logical and simple extension to NAFTA chapter 10 which already mandates preferential treatment for open standards. Canadian International Trade Tribunal and FLOSS http://weblog.flora.org/article.php3?story_id=448 First step is getting the policy in place. Next and much harder step is educating current bureaucrats to the reasoning and benefit to them and society of these policies so that they will discontinue looking for loopholes. --- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> Governance software that controls ICT, automates government policy, or electronically counts votes, shouldn't be bought any more than politicians should be bought. -- http://www.flora.ca/russell/