Re: 6. Re: looks like it's happening everywhere
"Jan C. Depner" <[email protected]> 28 Oct 2003 10:13:32 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usage.government |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1067357612.15257.54.camel@eviltwin> |
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 09:46, [email protected] wrote: > BUT what is to stop Closed source work moving offshore? Even here in Canada there are jurisdictions that are encouraging job development for Phone centers. Every day on my way to work I pass a building that used to be a building store that was taken over by COMPAQ as a phone center. Their name is now off the building, but I understand that it is still used for the same function. > > Microsoft can just as easily do engineering in the middle and far east as anyone else. They already do but they do have a huge number of US employees. I was just pointing out that if M$ went out of business there would be a large number of unemployed programmers here because it's *much* cheaper to outsource it overseas. > > I tend to agree with that but our methodologies would > > differ. I think > > that the government should mandate open standards thus taking away > > Micro$oft's advantage. > > That alone might be enough, if something could be done about the "compatibility with the installed base" issue was part of the plan. > Yeah, that's a PITA. > BUT - portions of them could be. I am guessing based on what my wife used to do with audio, that almost all of the above are Applications of DSP? All could for example probably use "the fastest Fourier transform in the west"? > > Assuming that the regulations that probably declare all the above "Munitions" were not in the way, I am sure that the Dutch navy for example would be quite happy to collaborate on that sort of thing, even the entertainment industry (computer graphics effects) and Petrol exploration would have an interest in sharing the costs of such products.. (Analysis of Sonar and Analysis of seismic geology probably have a lot in common) > Nope. Very little DSP. Mostly dealing with large amounts of data (240 beams at 40 pings/sec = 576000 soundings/minute) for hazards to navigation. You can't use filters on this data without being able to verify that you didn't inadvertently delete a coral head/ship mast/well head/funny pointy thing sticking up out of the bottom/rock that the QE 2 runs into. > Americans with Disability act? Or one of the setoff programs for small business/minority/disabled/ etc. > Programming language that was designed for embedded systems. Congress passed a law that all DoD programs would be written in ADA unless you got a waiver from SecDef. ADA is a pretty lousy language and it kind of died slowly. I believe the law is still on the books though. Companies would tell us that we could have it in C++ for X dollars but it would cost us 10 to 100 X dollars in ADA. -- ******************************** Jan C. Depner Code N43T Naval Oceanographic Office 1002 Balch Blvd Stennis Space Center MS, 39522 228.688.5609 ******************************** I'm a programmer with a soldering iron, and I'm not afraid to use it.