Re: US Govt Licensing (was licensing)
"Jan C. Depner" <[email protected]> 28 Oct 2003 13:42:43 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usage.government |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1067370163.15257.71.camel@eviltwin> |
I meant complete works, not additions to existing work. Jan On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 11:28, Tom Adelstein wrote: >=20 >=20 > [email protected] wrote: > > That's pretty much the same answer I got from our lawyer. Any work by > > the US government that has been released to the public is public > > domain. I didn't know about the assignment of copyright but it wouldn'= t > > help me any. > >=20 > > Jan >=20 > I guess I see some confusion around NSA's Linux SE. Here's what they say=20 > about their license: >=20 > All source code found on this site is released under the same terms and=20 > conditions as the original sources. For example, the patches to the=20 > Linux kernel, patches to many existing utilities, and some of the new=20 > programs available here are released under the terms and conditions of=20 > the GNU General Public License (GPL). The patches to some existing=20 > utilities and libraries available here are released under the terms and=20 > conditions of the BSD license. Some new libraries and new programs=20 > available here are released into the public domain. >=20 > http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/license.html >=20 > Some additional information exists at: >=20 > http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/todo.html >=20 > I suppose that since Linux already existed and the code enhancements are=20 > contributions, they have stayed within the confines of GPL. >=20 > I'm wondering how that would work if a government agency worked on a=20 > tracking project for INS or DOJ and worked with my team on project=20 > leopard. Any thoughts? >=20 > - Tom >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 11:02, Tom Adelstein wrote: > >=20 > >>This may be a stale subject by now, but it came up at OSSI in=20 > >>relationship to work we're doing with Government members. > >> > >>The following information came from an email I found while researching=20 > >>the subject. Jan, you may want to comment on it. > >> > >> > >>Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl > >>Date: 2002-06-21 13:50:38 PST > >> > >> > >>>The Federal Government is explicitly forbidden from Copyrighting > >>>anything they create (they are, however, allowed to have a Copyright > >>>assigned to them). > >>> > >>> http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/105.html > >>> > >>>I asked our lawyers about whether or not I would be able to release > >>>programs that I've written and if I could release them under the GPL. > >>>Below is our lawyers response. > >>> > >>> > >>>Subject: Federal Copyright & the GPL > >>>To: Thomas.C.Allard > >>>From: bryan.a.bonner > >>> > >>> > >>>Tom, > >>> > >>>[...] You asked: > >>> > >>> I would like to release some of the software libraries that I've > >>> developed at the Board on my own private web site, and I would pr= efer > >>> to use the GNU Public License. > >>> > >>> Since this software was developed at and for the Board, am I allo= wed > >>> to release under the GPL (which is, in essence, a copyright licen= se)? > >>> > >>>Tom the software you developed is government property. As you know, > >>>17 U.S.C. 105 states copyright protection is not available for any wor= k of > >>>the United States Government. Since the GNU Public License requires > >>>copyrighting the software as a means to obtain the license, you would = not > >>>be able to put the software libraries on you private web site under th= e GNU > >>>Public License. > >>> > >>>You also asked: > >>> > >>> More specifically, do I as the developer hold a copyright on my > >>> software or is it public domain as it was developed by the=20 > >>> Federal Government? > >>> > >>> If I can't release it under the GPL, can I still post it on my we= b > >>> site as public domain software? > >>> > >>>Since the software was developed for the Board on official time as par= t of > >>>your official duties, the software is not "copyrightable" by anyone. = It > >>>exists in the public domain. > >>> > >>>Yes. You can still post the software libraries on your private web si= te as > >>>public domain software. However, there are a few things to keep in mi= nd: > >>> > >>> a) You cannot post any Board confidential information on your pr= ivate > >>>web site. The software libraries can contain no confidential mater= ial, > >>>but only material available to the general public. [...] > >>> > >>> b) Should you or others visitors to your site wish to use the > >>>software you developed for the Board, or any portion thereof, in their > >>>own software program, if the new software program (which integrates U.= S. > >>>Government software) is ever copyrighted, it should include a > >>>publication notice indicating which portions of the program belong to = the > >>>United States Government. According to the United States Copyright Of= fice > >>>(http://www.loc.gov/copyright): > >>> > >>> "Works by the U. S. Government are not eligible for U. S. copyrig= ht > >>>protection. For works published on and after March 1, 1989, the previo= us > >>>notice requirement for works consisting primarily of one or more U. S. > >>>Government works has been eliminated. However, use of a notice on suc= h > >>>a work will defeat a claim of innocent infringement as previously desc= ribed > >>>provided the notice also includes a statement that identifies either > >>>those portions of the work in which copyright is claimed or those > >>>portions that constitute U. S. Government material. > >>> > >>> "Example: =A9 2000 Jane Brown. Copyright claimed in Chapters 7-10= , > >>>exclusive of U. S. Government maps > >>> > >>> "Copies of works published before March 1, 1989, that consist > >>>primarily of one or more works of the U. S. Government should have a > >>>notice and the identifying statement." > >>> > >>>Any new programs incorporating U.S. Government software should contain > >>>a similar notice and identifying statement. > >>> > >>>Feel free to post this answer on your personal web site. [...] > >>> > >>>Bryan > >>> > >>> > >>>--- > >>>rgds-- TA ([email protected]) > >>>Disclaimer: I don't speak for the Federal Reserve Board. > >> --=20 ******************************** Jan C. Depner Code N43T Naval Oceanographic Office 1002 Balch Blvd Stennis Space Center MS, 39522 228.688.5609 ******************************** I'm a programmer with a soldering iron, and I'm not afraid to use it.