Microsoft's Government Security Program (GSP)
Russell McOrmond <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Feb 2003 20:16:47 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usage.government |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Here is another angle on MS's GSP that is worthy of investigating. Is
this another dangerous government boondoggle? I really hope that the
Canadian Government will avoid this legal trap.
http://weblog.flora.ca/article.php3?story_id=341
Many publications have started to write about Microsoft's Government
Security Program (GSP), but with very little details. What source
license source code comes with is more important than the availability
of source code. As I am writing in an early draft article on software
licensing, source code under non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is the
opposite of Free/Libre and Open Source Software. Source under NDA is
also 'more proprietary' and involves considerably more legal risk than
closed-source software.
...
---
Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
Any 'hardware assist' for communications, whether it be eye-glasses,
VCR's, or personal computers, must be under the control of the citizen
and not a third party. -- http://www.flora.ca/russell/
This Linux in Government list is sponsored by Linux Journal.