Re: suspending hid devices
Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > currently hid-core's suspend() method only kills the input URB and > leaves the output URB alone. I am afraid this is incorrect. I've done a > patch, but I am looking for a solution regarding resumption. It seems to > me that it might wake up tasks too early. Comments? Hi Oliver, thanks, I think that basically killing output URBs is a good thing to do, however the resuming will need some more thinking. What are all the scenarios you can see that waiters on hid->wait will be woken too early? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel