Re: suspending hid devices
Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > currently hid-core's suspend() method only kills the input URB and > > > leaves the output URB alone. I am afraid this is incorrect. I've > > > done a patch, but I am looking for a solution regarding resumption. > > > It seems to me that it might wake up tasks too early. Comments? > > thanks, I think that basically killing output URBs is a good thing to do, > After discussion with Pavel and Rafael, I am convinced it is not necessary. > The code can stay as is. Yup, I just finished that thread in lkml, seems to make sense. Thanks for taking care. -- Jiri Kosina ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel