Re: PATCH: usb: descriptor structures have to be packed

Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Organization Novell
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 23:48 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:08:19 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > [btw, I truly have little idea about which are those specific costs,
> >  out of professional curiosity, got any pointers?]
> 
> http://www.digitalvampire.org/blog/articles/2006/07/31/why-you-shouldnt-use-__attribute__-packed
> 
> This is only an example though, and depending on the situation you might
> want to trade traps for bloat or vice versa. I am not against using
> the packed attribute, I'm against using it without thinking.
> 
> > How do suggest we tackle this issue? 
> 
> I would access by byte. But keep doing what you're doing. It's a David's
> code, and Itanium is dead like a stone anyway. I only want you to know
> that __attribute((__packed__)) is hardly superior to the old style which
> worked fine for a 1000 years before gcc.

This means throwing away the type information. What we are accessing isn't
a stream of bytes, it is a structured object of defined endianness.

	Regards
		Oliver

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.