Re: Bug in usb_match_one_id()?
Alan Stern <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:53:31PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > Greg: > > > > When you refactored the USB device-matching code, you may have introduced > > a bug. Does it seem reasonable that an entry might contain both > > device-specific and interface-specific criteria to match? > > I don't know of any such entries, do you? No, I don't. This is just a matter of being theoretically correct instead of theoretically wrong. After all, it's not a highly invasive patch! :-) > Is this something that we want to support? Why not? The data structures already allow for it, and there's nothing in the documentation that says people shouldn't do it. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel