Re: autosuspend for storage devices
Alan Stern <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Also, it's debatable whether USB should autosuspend a storage device at > > all. Like with HID devices, it seems more logical to have autosuspend > > requests come up from the lower layer (in this case the SCSI layer). > > After all, suspending a disk could cause it to spin down, which is > > something the SCSI disk driver might want to be aware of. You could raise > > this question on the linux-scsi mailing list. > > I will. But which devices don't have an upper layer. I don't think usb-storage has any way of knowing. > And strictly > speaking I am not suspending devices. I am managing vetos. Call it what you will; the effect is the same. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel