Re: false positive -ENOSPC in ohci-q
Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:07:59AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 26 February 2007 7:11 am, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Hello, > > > > until I applied the below patch I couldn't use the usb camera at the > > same time of the usb modem (both usb1 devices). The camera returned > > -ENOSPC. Now they both work fine at the same time (camera managed by > > zoneminder and running all the time and the modem giving me the > > internet link, both without any apparent problem). > > NAK unless you can demonstrate a bug in the logic you disabled. demonstrate a bug? I thought I already did. Things works perfectly with that code disabled: zoneminder analyzes 8 frames per second while my RTT latency to the other end of the modem is still 10msec and I get zero errors and everything works flawlessy. With that broken code compiled in, as soon as I connect to the internet the camera returns -ENOSPC. What else could I ever need to do in order to demonstrate that there is a bug in the logic that I disabled? I'm afraid I can't provide a mathematical proof, cause I don't even understand what that code is doing and what a worthless number 90% can ever be when things may work perfectly at 95% load too (can you instead demonstrate that 90% is a correct max load instead of 95% or 100%?). Code like that must be overoptimistic! it should catch over-exaggerate bandwidth loads that are absolutely guaranteed to fail, it must not be overstrict like it seems to be now, in turn generating false positives. Now if this is a hardware bug in the modem or the camera, I still would need a runtime tweak to disable that heuristic that clearly can choke in practice with real life usage (I can also imagine hardware advertising a peak value, but if run in certain modes, like with low res, generating lower max-values, so a runtime tweak to tell the heuristic to go away still sounds useful even if this wouldn't be a hardware issue and if the heuristic would be legitimate at only 90%). > Looks more like your config is one that's disallowed. I tried all possibile config and tweaks, so I doubt you can blame on me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel