Re: [PATCH 4/4] USB: export autosuspend delay in sysfs
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Freitag, 9. März 2007 20:50 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2007 16:57 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > What happens when the opposite end of a network connection tries to send > > > data to a suspended system? Yes, TCP is pretty aggressive about retries, > > > but doesn't it eventually give up? > > > > Sure, eventually. Nothing is perfect. Suspension will cost performance > > and/or functionality. Is that reason not to limit that loss? > > I'm still not sure how good an idea it is. But let's say we do it. > Then the new power/level attribute file would have 4 possible values: > > on, auto, suspend, and suspend-without-autoresume Why? What's the difference to remote wakeup which we don't encode here? Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel