Re: More about autoresume
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Novell |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 14:31 schrieb Alan Stern: > Oliver: > > Suppose the superuser has suspended a USB device and disabled autoresume. > Then what should happen under the following circumstances? > > 1. The device's usbfs file is opened (or already was open > and now gets accessed). > > 2. The user writes to the bConfigurationValue attribute. The first two, yes they should. You get what you asked for. > 3. A new driver module is loaded and it is probed for one > of the device's interfaces. I am not sure. Consequently waking up the device would cause probe to be called again, but this seems overkill. > As things stand now, all three would fail. Does that seem reasonable? > > Alan Stern > > P.S.: You've got 3 or 4 different email addresses floating around, and I'm > never quite sure which one to use. Which is best? Any will do. If you use the suse address you will get me only during business hours. (CET) Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel