Re: question on irqs and memory ordering
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Novell |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 17:29 schrieb David Howells: > How about the following: > > > INTERRUPT HANDLING > ------------------ > > Execution of the interrupt handler chain for an interrupt not bound to a CPU > is bounded by a lock/unlock at either side. Furthermore, recurrence of that > interrupt is suppressed whilst its interrupt handler chain is executing. This > means that with respect to itself, an interrupt handler chain can be assumed > to have a full memory barrier between executions, no matter if it migrates to > another CPU between invocations. Splendid. Would you make a patch? Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel