Re: [PATCH] iforce: Use usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb.

Hi Johann,

On Saturday 17 March 2007 17:50, johann deneux wrote:
> A note about that patch: Apparently Anders Fugmann submitted a patch to use
> usb_kill_urb to linux-usb-devel for version 2.6.10.
> I don't know if this patch got lost, or if it was rejected.

Since every other USB dirver uses usb_kill_urb it loosk like the patch was
just missed...
 
> 
> On 3/17/07, johann deneux <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > commit 0ba8785483c2ee7f56e8f242e000f6cd17a7da40
> > Author: Johann Deneux <[email protected]>
> > Date:   Sat Mar 17 22:23:44 2007 +0100
> >
> >     iforce: Use usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb.
> >
> >     Using usb_unlink_urb can cause iforce_open to fail when called soon
> > after iforce_release.
> >     Also updated my email address and replaced calls to printk() by dbg(),
> > warn(), info(), err()...
> >

Since there seems a lot of implementations of r warn(), err(), etc what kind
of output would iforce produce?

-- 
Dmitry