Re: autosuspend default
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Montag, 19. März 2007 17:21 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I got another bug report about a scanner disconnecting when > > suspended. Could we introduce a setting for deciding whether > > unbound devices should by default be subject to autosuspend? > > That's what the new quirks are for. Besides, what's wrong with having an > unbound device disconnect? Doesn't it reconnect when the port is resumed? http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8231 It seems a good idea to me to limit right now, the basically meaningless bug reports to make a better signal/noise ratio and find problems with the code as opposed to devices. Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel