Re: [patch] usb video class support

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:14:54PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Curran, Dominic wrote:
> 
> > > > > I don't see much use for adding this information if it's not even
> > > going
> > > > > to be included by any file just yet :(
> > > > I published this patch now for that somebody can help me later.
> > > 
> > > Ok, but the structures were the easy part :)
> > > 
> > > I'll wait to add this to the tree when there is some code using it.
> > > 
> > 
> > Greg, I thought that the preferred model for submitting a new driver was
> > to provide it in small bits, and not as one bit chunk at the end.
> > 
> > Doesn't a header file qualify as a small bit ?
> > 
> > I've always been a bit confused by what in practice you do want from new
> > drivers, so I'm very interested in what you are expecting.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > dom
> 
> For that matter, how much in-tree code uses the Wireless USB declarations?  
> It seems to me that if one is acceptable then the other should be too.

I don't see the wireless USB drivers having a whole header file in the
tree that is unused, do you?  :)

And I've also seen the wireless usb code working, while as this is a
header file with no written code at all in existance...

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel