Re: [PATCH]dma rules violation in the option driver
Alan Stern <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Since both network and block I/O are high performance subsystems, > I always regarded all performance arguments for usb_buffer_alloc > as rubbish. I don't understand what you're getting at. The idea behind usb_buffer_alloc() is to help improve performance. Why should that be rubbish when it's embedded in a high-performance subsystem? Isn't it exactly how you would want a high-performance subsystem to behave? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel