Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] HID bus design overview.
"Adam Kropelin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Li Yu wrote: > >> What's the position of hidraw? It only is used when all other driver >> is not usable on some report? or, it should be stick every working >> device. > > Current implementation (as you can see it in -mm or in my hid.git > tree) is creating hidraw interface for just every HID > device/interface. But this will get changed before merge. > > Passing just everything to hidraw is not a good option, as this could > lead to confusion and duplicating of input events (i.e. in-kernel hid > driver processes the report and generates input_event(), and also > userland driver obtains data from hidraw and generates input event > through uinput ... not good). I apologize for picking up this thread late and asking what may be a question with an obvious answer... Will hiddev still exist after hidraw and the HID bus redesign work is done? I have a widely-deployed userspace app that relies on hiddev, and I'm looking for reassurance that it will still work as it always has... --Adam