Re: How should an exit routine wait for release() callbacks?

Robert Marquardt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alan Stern wrote:

> On the other hand, this proposal involves adding a fair amount of overhead
> (all those .owner fields) for a rather small benefit.  And it involves
> modifying a core kernel subsystem (kernel/module.c).  All to prevent
> certain unlikely sorts of errors when removing a module -- something which
> Linus has said repeatedly need not be supported terribly well.
> 
> So I'm uncertain whether other people will be in favor of all this.

I think Linus is in error here. Either do it right or not at all. I 
would say that modules should work *always* and without any conceptual 
problem.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.