Re: current state of USB SUSPEND?
Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Jeroen Janssen wrote: > I noticed several recent USB SUSPEND related patches on this mailinglist > and I was wondering if someone could tell me what the current state of > USB SUSPEND is. Should USB devices be suspend 'automaticly' (by the > kernel) when suspending to ram? Or do I need to manually suspend the > devices somehow? Hi Jerome, USB suspend is not closely related to suspending of the system (swsusp/acpi). USB suspend is independent, and allows for USB-specific suspending of devices that have not been recently used, to reduce power consumption. The USB_SUSPEND feature has been present in mainline kernel for quite some time, under CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND option. The patches that have been discussed lately here were related to some changes of the usb suspend architecture, allowing per-device specification of timeout before putting device to suspend, etc. -- Jiri Kosina ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel