Re: Request for assistance (2Wire netdev)
David Brownell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 20 April 2007 8:46 am, Mark Glassberg wrote: > Applied the patch. It looks like we took a step back. The latest dmesg, > lsusb, and usbdevices files are attached. I thought you might want to see > them Good to see those ... those are expected results, other than the timeouts one time through (which I'm assuming are Heisenbergs). Clean failures were the _expected_ result of that patch, and that's what those files show. > before I comment out the "goto fail_and_release" statement. Just let > me know if you want to see the results of that change. Yes, that's the change that *might* make this device work -- if it can, and that's not guaranteed. The fact that your device didn't fail that RNDIS request is presumably a good sign. The fact that it handled it incorrectly ... hard to say, it's not like the MSFT world cares about following specs that much, even ones saying how MS-Windows should work. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel