Re: Is libusb dead?
Greg KH <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:24:02AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 24. April 2007 00:35 schrieb Greg KH: > > > This suggests that usbfs2 should have special "interface" files as well as > > > a special "device" file and "endpoint" files. > > > > Nah, I don't think that will be needed. > > 1. Interfaces have properties, namely the setting Yes, which we should be able to control through the control endpoint with an ioctl, right? > 2. We cannot operate solely at the level of the endpoint > We must know which requests are affected when an interface > is affected, eg. reset cannot restore the altsetting. This cannot work > at the endpoint level because endpoint 0 is shared. We cannot drop > claiming an interface as is done in the current usbfs. Once you open an endpoint that is not endpoint 0 that would signify that the interface is then "claimed" as far as the kernel goes, right? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel