Re: requirements for suspend()
David Brownell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 04 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2007 06:47 schrieb Greg KH: > > > > My opinion is that we need to ensure that we can still do the > > "fire-and-forget" type driver :) > > Did you intentionally not mention them needing to be easy to use as > well as possible? > > Well, forgetting your URBs has the obvious problem that you have no > legitimate reference to call usb_kill_urb() with. So keeping them in a list > the driver keeps up to date is not an option. But they have to be on a list. Should URBs be managable by devres/devm style stuff? I don't seem to recall that having suspend/resume support though. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel