Re: [patch]Re: autosuspend for HID devices, take #2

Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:25:36PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007 17:42 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On Wed, 23 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > 
> > > > That gives me an idea.
> > > > Resumption of a device has to be done in task context. So if I allocate
> > > > a private freezable work queue for HID resumption, the freezer would
> > > > guard against illicit resumptions, wouldn't it?
> > > 
> > > You can use the ksuspend_usb_wq workqueue.  It already exists, is 
> > > freezable, and is used for suspending and resuming USB devices.
> > 
> > This adds a clean accessor for the USB core pm workqueue.
> 
> But what code is using it?  I don't want to add an api call if no one
> uses it...

In fact there's a potential user in hcd.c:usb_hcd_resume_root_hub().  
If there's to be an accessor, that routine should use it.

Oliver, you should be careful about what happens when CONFIG_PM is off.  
Under those conditions the workqueue is not created.

Alan Stern


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.