Re: patch to shift memory allocations to usb_alloc_urb()
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: > > This brings me to an idea. > > Is it possible to accept the next scsi request while the current request is > > being executed? That way, when the first request finishes, the URBs > > could be retained if they are needed right away and otherwise freed. > > It's _possible_, but why go through all that work? Just keep the URBs > allocated permanently. They don't take up much space compared with > UHCI's TDs. I was hoping to keep everything, not just the URBs. Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel