Re: [patch 14/17] usb: add usb_dev_reset_delayed

Ragner Magalhaes <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
ext [email protected] wrote:

> +
> +/*
> + * We need to lock the device before resetting, but we may already have the
> + * lock. So we try to lock the device, if it fails (returns < 0) then we
> + * cannot proceed. If it returned 1 then we acquired the lock here and need
> + * to release the lock. If it returned 0 then we already have the lock and
> + * we leave it to the piece that acquired the lock to release it.
> + */
> +static
> +void usb_dev_reset_delayed_task(struct work_struct *ws)
> +{
> +	struct usb_dev_reset_ctx *reset_ctx =
> +		container_of(ws, struct usb_dev_reset_ctx, ws);
> +	struct usb_device *usb_dev = reset_ctx->usb_dev;
> +	struct device *dev = &usb_dev->dev;
> +	int had_to_lock;
> +	int result = 0;
> +
> +	if (usb_dev == NULL) {
> +		WARN_ON(1);
> +		goto release;
> +	}
> +	had_to_lock = usb_lock_device_for_reset(usb_dev, NULL);
> +	if (had_to_lock < 0) {
> +		if (had_to_lock != -ENODEV)	// ignore dissapearance
Comment with "//" above ...
> +			dev_err(dev, "Cannot lock device for reset: %d\n",
> +				had_to_lock);
> +	} else {
> +		result = usb_reset_device(usb_dev);
> +		if (result < 0 && result != -ENODEV)
> +			dev_err(dev, "Unable to reset device: %d\n", result);
> +		if (had_to_lock)
> +			usb_unlock_device(usb_dev);
> +	}
> +	usb_dev->delayed_reset = 0;
> +	usb_put_dev(usb_dev);
> +release:
> +	kfree(reset_ctx);
> +	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> +}
> +
> +

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.