Re: [PATCH] aio_run_iocb should always retry

David Brownell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.aio.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday 24 July 2007, Zach Brown wrote:
> So, the sad story is that the cancellation support in fs/aio.c is a  
> mess.  Before we get lost on those details can we talk about simply  
> not allowing cancelation of these usbfs2 aio read requests?  If they  
> guarantee forward progress

Nope ... if there were progress, cancelation wouldn't be needed!


> 			then you can just do what dio does.  Don't   
> set ki_cancel, they'll eventually complete.

This is regular I/O ... the stuff that operating systems originally
created async frameworks to address.  It seems that trying to unify
that notion with filesystem stacks has been a headache.  So there's
a fair amount of interest in throwing baby out with bathwater.  :(




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.