Re: usb-serial.c question - potential Memory fault

Greg KH <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:13:08AM +0200, Alain Degreffe wrote:
> Well I try to follow pl2303
> 
> wMaxPacketSize     0x0040  1x 64 bytes is the size retuned by the endpoint
> (I just plug my own pl2303 to check the value)
> 
> line / code
> 
> 330                 priv->buf = pl2303_buf_alloc(PL2303_BUF_SIZE); where
> PL2303_BUF_SIZE = 1024 !
> 
> 
> 377         count = pl2303_buf_get(priv->buf,
> port->write_urb->transfer_buffer, <--- here
> port->write_urb->transfer_buffer size = wMaxPacketSize
> 
> 
> 
> 378                                port->bulk_out_size);
> 379
> 
> 278 static unsigned int pl2303_buf_get(struct pl2303_buf *pb, char *buf,
> 279                                    unsigned int count)
> {
> 
> 286         len = pl2303_buf_data_avail(pb);
> 
> 293         len = pb->buf_buf + pb->buf_size - pb->buf_get;
> 
> 295                 memcpy(buf, pb->buf_get, len); <----------- here len
> is nerver bigger than 64 ?????

I don't see how it it would be bigger, that function checks that len
will never be bigger than count.

Do you?

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.