Re: usb-serial.c question - potential Memory fault

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:49:34AM +0200, Alain Degreffe wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> You are right ( of course ), but using the buffer given by the usb-serial
> seems to bo logic as I said.
> By this way I don't create unnecessary buffer. But in bulk transfer, the
> buffer_size can be greater than
> The value given by the endpoint. The usb lowlevel will split the bulk
> tranfsert. 
> So, why this limit in the usb-serial.c ?

It is there just because it has always been that way, no specific reason
at all.

> For the moment , I kfree the buffer In the my open function and create
> a new one bigger.   

That can work too, and is fine if you want to do that.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel