Re: Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers
Alan Stern <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Sam Liddicott wrote: > From: "Greg KH" <[email protected]> > Sent: 10/08/07 04:30 > > =There's no way we could ever get a list of all good or all bad printers, > =so no matter what we do, we'd miss some :( > > But better to miss suspend on some than miss working altogether on others surely? > > I never heard an outcry on lack if suspend that compares to that from those whose USB devices stopped working when their distro upgraded the kernel. Even if we don't handle printers right now, it would help to cover all scanners with a single class-wide quirks entry instead of lots of individual device entries. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel