Re: Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: > Oliver and Pete: > > Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries > for scanners with a single class-wide entry? Which class? It would have to blanket all vendor specific devices. This is a rather broad swipe. > What about printers? Just remove the autosuspend support from the driver if you really want to do this. > Would a USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME entry suffice or do we really need > NO_AUTOSUSPEND? Having no way to test, I am conservative. Besides, is RESET_RESUME the right thing to do for a device driven by usbfs? It would turn close() into an operation that can cause a reset as a side effect. Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel