Re: USB host-to-host console

David Turvene <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.usb.user
Message-ID <1187768706.17031.72.camel@skor>
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 20:43 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 20 August 2007, Steve Calfee wrote:
> > You can buy a single dongle that both hosts connect to (I think as a 
> > network - it just does option 2, with the connection internal to the 
> > dongle). I google'd "net-linq" I think it is supported by the linux usb stuff.
> 
> See drivers/net/usb/Kconfig and look for the host-to-host cables.
> That gives an network type link.  I don't know if that 'net-linq'
> cable has a driver, but I'd assume it does.
> 
> Unfortunately most of those chip vendors haven't provided enough
> specs to support what I'd call rock-solid drivers.  Most of the
> chips have awkward failure/transition modes when one end of the
> cable gets unplugged, even if the end still connected is the one
> used to power the chip inside.  They may even have rude failures
> if you just throw a fat enough network load at them...
> 
> Fullspeed host-host cables with Prolific chips (PL2301/2302)
> have those nasty failures.  So do their high speed ones (PL2501),
> and the high speed ones from ALI (M5632).  Unfortunately that
> means all the widely available cables I've seen are trouble...
> 
> I've got two adapters that have been solid; both are full-speed
> only (nominal 12 Mbit/sec).  I don't think either is sold any
> longer ... one has a Net1080 chip, and I think some LapLink USB
> cables ("gold"?) used them; maybe some Belkin ones too.  The
> other was a predecessor design, an early Belkin adapter, which
> used two separate net2280 chips with an AVR microcontroller; the
> design was licensed by eTEK to several companies.
> 
> Both those adapters have been rock solid "never misbehaved" in
> my use/testing.  If you can get some of those, go for it!
> And there may be some others too ... but be careful, and test
> them aggressively before you start to rely on them.
> 
> - Dave
> 

Dave -

Thanks for the info; I see your footprints through a lot of the code.

First, one question: are the new Vista Easy Transfer cables (e.g. Belkin
F5U258) simply a re-branding effort?  Are they basically the cables you
mention above or is there some different technology involved?

After spending a couple hours researching, I found that almost all USB
host-host cables in the US use either Prolific or PLX/Netchip.  The Ali
M5632 seems to be more available in Europe.  I didn't find any NET1080
devices - which seems to be EOLed.  The NET2280 is used in the Belkin
F5U104, which is still in production and relatively cheap; this seems
like the best choice from your email.

But then it hit me: buying two USB-DB9 dongles and a null modem ($65) is
a good-enough-for-now solution with a couple minutes of configuration.
I'm staring at all these beautiful trees in front of me but I have to
find a way out of this forest soon - the closest exit seems to be at the
end of a DB9 plug.  Cool stuff, though!

Dave



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.