Re: lsusb omits some devices and (apparently) cannot be fixed

"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <1189722842l.13173l.5l@mofo>
On 09/13/2007 05:17:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc a écrit :

> > lsusb silently ignores at least some permission errors, resulting in
> > no output for the device to which there are no permissions.

> 
> As already explained, lsusb does not parse /dev, but uses libusb for
> that. If a device is not in the list given by libusb, lsusb has no way
> to guess that a device is missing.

That's why I'm writing to (I hope) the authors of Linux's usb
internals, so they can expose an interface libusb can use
to come up with good error reporting.

Regards /dev, my point is that the existence of the device
_is_ knowable to the account without permissions to
the device, so all the necessary information is
available.  Something just needs to put
it together to come up with an error message.


Karl <[email protected]>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.