Re: bug in usb_serial_probe?
Alan Stern <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Sarah Sharp wrote: > Darn. Why do I pick the subsystems that need a rewrite? No mystery there -- most subsystems need a rewrite! :-) > I was going to > write an autosuspend patch for my pl2303 USB serial adaptor. I suppose > it will be a good learning experience, even if the code doesn't get used > in the rewrite. Sure, go right ahead. There might not be a rewrite for quite some time (if ever), and people may be able to make use of the autosuspend support. My advice: Put as much of the support as you can into the generic usb-serial core. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel