defficiencies in the hid autosuspend code
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I am thinking about putting the PID detection code back in. The problem I am now facing is that moving to a whitelist some opportunities are missed. What should happen to devices that can suspend just fine while not in use, like joysticks, but will fail if suspended while in use. It seems to me that a binary decision on autosuspend is not enough for USB HID devices. Should there be another channel? Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel