Re: handling failure in suspend() during autosuspend
Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Freitag 05 Oktober 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Am Freitag 05 Oktober 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > As far as the race is concerned... In practice it shouldn't matter > > > unless autosuspend_delay is set to 0. I suppose autosuspend_check() > > > could take an extra "reschedule" flag. If the flag was set, the > > > routine would schedule another autosuspend attempt (with a 1-second > > > delay) if the idle-time period had already expired. > > > > OK. Like this? > > I had in mind something a little more cautious, like this: That's fine by me. Thanks Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel