Re: Unsupported device message, Compliance C.2, part 4
Aras Vaichas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alan Stern wrote: >> "The USB-IF enforces a "no silent failure" rule. This means that an >> implementation of USB must not appear broken to the consumer. In configurations >> where the consumer's expectations are not met, either the peripheral or host >> must provide appropriate and useful feedback to the consumer regarding the >> problem." > > In an embedded host, the system log probably isn't accessible to the > user. Error messages would have to appear somewhere else -- although > just where would depend on the particular system. I was just looking at sysfs and I noticed that when a known USB device is plugged in that a "product" file is created in /sys/devices/platform/at91_ohci/usb1/1-1/ An unknown device will not cause this file to be created, therefore that sounds like a good signalling mechanism to me. This is something that I can work with. Aras ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel