Re: [2.4 patch] Port of adutux driver from 2.6 kernel to 2.4.

Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:56:03AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:41:38 +0200, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I have no objection, but please apply the fixes the le16 problem as
> > suggested by Pete and Greg first. Also, you will probably receive more
> > comments, and/or criticisms from further reviews. This is normal and
> > expected. You just have to fix your code so that it can be merged.
> 
> I do not object to the driver (with byte order fixed), although it seems
> written oddly... E.g. lots of trivial comments, the open count locked
> by wrong lock. But I do not want to hold the 2.4 version hostage to
> errors of the mainline. We should've caught them when we merged adutux
> into Greg's tree. I have to admit I'm skipping reviewing a lot of 2.6.

I really appreciate your position, Pete. It's fair and motivating for
newcomers. I hope Vitalyi will be able to forward-port some fixes and
cleanups to 2.6 in the future.

Thanks,
Willy


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.