Re: USB_SUSPEND needs SUSPEND?

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 17:50, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday, 28 October 2007 02:00, Oliver Martin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > it seems that there is some dependency missing for CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND.
> > > When I compile a kernel without CONFIG_SUSPEND, USB suspend doesn't work
> > > (or at least doesn't expose its interface to userspace).
> > > /sys/bus/usb/devices/.../power doesn't exist, but it is there when I
> > > enable CONFIG_SUSPEND. So should CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND depend on
> > > CONFIG_SUSPEND (or something selected by CONFIG_SUSPEND)?
> > > 
> > > diff between the two configs follows, full config and dmesg for both
> > > kernels is available at http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0626486/usb_suspend/
> > > (though the dmesg diff doesn't seem to be all that interesting).
> 
> Actually I think the problem is the other way around.  /sys/.../power 
> should exist whenever CONFIG_PM is defined, not just when 
> CONFIG_SUSPEND is enabled.

Agreed.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.