Re: usb_submit_urb from callback
"Chris Hiszpanski" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002101c82570$196874a0$1201a8c0@satellite> |
> > Hi Greg, > > > > I found these prototype differences between the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels: > > > > /* 2.4 kernel */ > > int usb_submit_urb(struct urb *urb); > > > > /* 2.6 kernel */ > > int usb_submit_urb(struct urb *urb, int mem_flags); > > > > In the 2.6 kernel, to re-submit a URB from within a URB's callback function, > > the second argument must be GFP_ATOMIC. How is URB re-submission > > from within a URB's callback function handled under the 2.4 kernel, without > > the mem_flags argument? > > Might I ask why you are caring about the 2.4 usb stack? That kernel is > not supported anymore... We still use 2.4 on our production systems. > Anyway, please ask questions like this on the linux-usb-devel mailing > list and CC: me. I'll be glad to answer them that way so that everyone > can benefit. Here it is. > thanks, > > greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel