Re: usbfs and MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.usb.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pete Zaitcev wrote: > The control should be limited to a page. It is preposterous to think > of anyone trying to send a control message with a buffer bigger than > a couple hundred bytes, a thousand at most. If you managed to trick > USBDEVFS_CONTROL into sending more than 16KB at a go, a check must be > missing somewhere. Fair argument. I haven't actually tried sending a big urb through USBDEVFS_CONTROL but I noticed that MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE is not checked in that codepath. I wonder if something else in the chain will reject big control urbs. Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel