Re: USB device with multiple non-sequential interfaces

"Kevin Lloyd" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <3415E2A2AB26944B9159CDB22001004D020BD622@nestea.sierrawireless.local>
Given this is a violation of the USB spec do you foresee removing
support in the future (i.e. erroring-out as opposed to just warning the
user)?
 
Thanks,
-Kevin

> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > When I plugged in a USB device that has two interfaces that are not
> > sequential, say interface#1 and interface#99 I get the following
error
> > message:
> >        usb 2-2: config 1 has an invalid interface number: 99 but max
is
> > 1
> > 	usb 2-2: config 1 has no interface number 1
> > 
> > I was wondering what the reason for this is, why would it not be
okay to
> > have multiple interfaces that are not sequentially numbered?
>
> Because the USB spec says interfaces must be numbered sequentially 
> starting from 0.
>
> > Also I that it still loaded the driver for the second interface, is
this
> > maybe just a warning?
>
> Yes.
>
> Alan Stern



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.