fpsub vs. usbfs2

Sarah Sharp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.general,gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <20071231171904.GA29646@localdomain>
Hi Daniel,

Have you looked at usbfs2?  It sounds like usbfs2 and fpusb have some similar
goals, although I admit I only glanced briefly at your wiki.

http://wiki.cs.pdx.edu/usb/usbfs2.html

Sarah Sharp

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:57:35AM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> >On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:26:34 +0000, Daniel Drake <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Fair argument. I haven't actually tried sending a big urb through 
> >>USBDEVFS_CONTROL but I noticed that MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE is not checked 
> >>in that codepath. I wonder if something else in the chain will reject 
> >>big control urbs.
> >
> >But you did want it for something, didn't you?
> 
> Not exactly. I am writing a userspace USB I/O library (like libusb), and 
> during testing I realised that I could not submit a bulk URB for ~110kb 
> of data. While implementing the code to divide the request into several 
> URBs, the thought "I wonder how this works for control URBs" crossed my 
> mind. That's all :)
> 
> I published the source of my library yesterday:
> http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/Fpusb
> 
> Daniel
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.