Re: SAS preventive disk replacement
Gandalf Corvotempesta <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:20:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJH6TXi7tJKP1Mbq=csQ0WvVrKP2Kz_hzhQi-qZONU58oUAcMw@mail.gmail.com> |
Il 28 nov 2016 22:36, "Håkon Alstadheim" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > If you run your drives within the temperature tolerance, then what > matters most is temperature /variability/ . I have some seagate SAS > drives that have a max temperature gradient (10 deg./ hour ?) specified. > You should be able to keep temperature changes way lower than that. > Other than that, total max-min span in temperature could also be meaningful. > > In addition to google, reading the spec.s on your drives could give some > insight. > Temperature is ok. so, the grown list or the uncorrected errors reported by smart aren't useful for proactive replacement? I also see some strangeness coming from the extented output (-x) that i don't know how to interpret If someone can give me some advice.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Smartmontools-support mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support